Hymenachne was observed in Southwest Florida as early as the late 1970's at
Owl Hammock near Immokalee by Mr. R.A. Roberts of Red Cattle Company. It has since been observed and documented by the author and others throughout many of the wetter areas of Collier County as well as in several other counties in South Florida including Lee, Charlotte, Hendry, Glades, Sarasota, and Desoto. How long this species has occurred in Florida, and the route of introduction is unknown, however, the relative proximity of known native habitats of hymenachne (e.g., Cuba, Dominican Rep., Jamaica) leaves open the possibility of natural introduction via migratory birds.
In Florida, hymenachne flowers and sporadically sets viable seed during short days commencing in November which coincides with the end of the wet season. Germination has been variable, ranging from 86 to 0%. Factors affecting hymenachne seed fertility are not clearly understood.
Hymenachne is sought after as natural grazing by cattle and wildlife throughout much of the year. Palatability remains high even at advanced stages of growth after flood waters have receded (Bogdan, 1977). Jiminez and Escobar (1977) reported that hymenachne was found to make up the highest portion (34.96%) of the diets of cattle grazing seasonally flooded savannas in Venezuela. Protein content was also highest (10.44 ± 1.82%) among grasses grazed in a study area consisting of bank, transitional, and waterlogged zones.
Dirvin (1962), conducted a study in Surinam in which the forage quality of hymenachne was examined. Crude protein content was found to be high with 15.8% in the whole plant, the leaves containing 22.6% CP, and the stems, 8.9% CP. Crude protein digestibility was also found to be high (66-80%) and it was higher in the stems than in the leaves.
In a study by Tejos (1980), at Apure, Venezuela, forage productivity of hymenachne was examined. Annual forage DM production during the flooding period was an average of 4.2 t/ac and ranged from a high of 8.1 t/ac to a low of 2.6 t/ac. During the dry season, average production was 3.1 t/ac. It was also shown that during the flooding period, hymenachne exhibited a slightly higher dry matter content in the leaves than in the stems, while the opposite held true during the dry period. Dirvin et al., (1960) also reported wide ranging annual DM yields for hymenachne grown in Surinam rice field fallows with values ranging from 1.7 to 9.19 t/ac.
A yield study was initiated in May 1990 at two ponded locations on the Immokalee Ranch in Collier County. Grazing exclosures (16' x 20') were constructed at each location in naturally established stands of hymenachne growing on Chobee muck soil. Four treatments were established with 4 replications in a randomized complete block design: 30, 60, and 90 day regrowth, and an unclipped control. Each plot was harvested to a 3" stubble height. No treatment received any lime or fertilizer.
Forage harvests were scheduled on a calendar basis (30 days). Dry matter yield was determined on samples oven dried at 60øC. Crude protein content and total digestible nutrients (TDN) were determined via wet chemistry by the Div. of Chemistry Feed Laboratory, Florida Dept. of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Tallahassee.
Shortly after establishing the study, one location became heavily infested with dog fennels as a result of the extremely dry spring. It was decided to continue the study for 1990 using only the Tippen's Crossing location.
| Table 1. Total DM yield and quality of Hymenachne amplexicaulis harvested at three cutting intervals from May to September. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment - Cutting Interval | |||
| 30 days | 60 days | 90 days | |
| CP, %* | 15.0 | 14.4 | 12.2 |
| TDN, %* | 52.7 | 51.9 | 50.1 |
| DM, %* | 6.66 | 5.93 | 2.71 |
| *Values expressed as a percent of the dry matter. | |||
Yield data indicated that a 30 day cutting interval resulted in the highest average DM yields (6.66 t/ac), but by the end of the study (4 cuttings) some decrease in stand vigor was observed. There was no detectable reduction in plant vigor for those plots harvested at 60 day intervals. These results suggest that hymenachne will support heavy repeated grazing, but will require periodic rest periods during the growing season.
Some flowering occurred in the 90 day and control plots as early as August, but 30 and 60 day treatments, as well as the surrounding grazed area delayed flowering until the end of October.
The study was concluded prematurely after the October harvest, since high water levels prevented access to the plots.
It was determined by visual observation that hymenachne occurs predominantly on Chobee muck soils that are included in SCS soil classification series 22 and 43. These soil series were cross referenced with vegetative plant communities of freshwater marshes, wet prairies, and cypress swamps to determine areas of potential for hymenachne.
Additional work is needed to determine areas and limits of adaptation in Florida, means of establishment, methods of management, and factors affecting seed production. Also, while it is apparent that hymenachne has been a part of the Florida range landscape for many years, careful study and monitoring for invasive potential should be conducted.
Dirvin, J. G. P. 1962. De voederwaarde van bladeren en stengels bij tropische grassen. Surin. Landb. No. 5, pp.199-202.
Dirvin, J. G. P., I. G. H. Dulder, and W. C. Hermelijn. 1960. De braakvegetative op risjstvelden in Nickerie. Surin. Landb. 8. No. 1, pp.1-7.
Hitchcock, A. S. 1936. Manual of the Grasses of the West Indies. United States Department of Agriculture, Miscellaneous Publication 243. p. 312.
Howard, R. A. 1979. Flora of the Lesser Antilles Leeward and Windward Islands. Vol 3, Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University.
Jiminez, E. G., and A. Escobar. 1977. Flood Adaptations and Productivity of Savanna Grasses. Proceedings of the 13th International Grasslands Congress. Section 3-4-5.
Li, Hui-Lin. 1978. Flora of Taiwan. Vol. 5. Epoch: Taiwan.
Medina, E., and N. Motta. 1990. Metabolism and distribution of grasses in tropical flooded savannas in Venezuela. J. of Trop. Ecology. 6:77.
Roberts, R. A. 1989 Personal communication. Immokalee, Florida.
Tejos, M. R. 1980. Production of water straw grass (Hymenachne amplexicaulis (Rudge) Nees) during a savanna period. Congreso Venezolano de Zootecnia, Guanare (Venezuela) p. 54.
Wildin, J. H. 1988. Register of Australian Herbage Plant Cultivars. Tropical Grasslands Journal. 22.4:190.
Wildin, J. H., and D. G. Chapman. 1987. Ponded pasture systems - capitalising on available water. Queensland Dept. of Primary Industry Bulletin RQR 87006.